<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel rdf:about="http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/156">
<title>Agricultural and Applied Economics</title>
<link>http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/156</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/5682"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/5464"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/5047"/>
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/4573"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T19:50:09Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/5682">
<title>ADOPTION AND IMPACT OF IMPROVED MAIZE VARIETIES ON  MAIZE PRODUCTIVITY AND FOOD INSECURITY IN AMURU  DISTRICT OF HORO GUDURU WOLLEGA, ETHIOPIA</title>
<link>http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/5682</link>
<description>ADOPTION AND IMPACT OF IMPROVED MAIZE VARIETIES ON  MAIZE PRODUCTIVITY AND FOOD INSECURITY IN AMURU  DISTRICT OF HORO GUDURU WOLLEGA, ETHIOPIA
Gemechis Merga Dorsis; Million Sileshi (PhD); Fresenbet Zeleke (PhD)
Government policy strategies, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), are aimed at increasing &#13;
agricultural productivity, which could lead to improved household food security and increased farm &#13;
income. In Ethiopia, the situation is similar. Hence, understanding smallholder farmers' low and &#13;
variable crop yields has been a central research and policy priority in addressing food security. This &#13;
study, therefore, aims at assessing adoption and impact of improved maize varieties on maize &#13;
productivity and food insecurity in Amuru district of Horo Guduru Wollega, Ethiopia. The study &#13;
utilized cross-sectional household level data collected in 2020/2021 from 263 randomly selected &#13;
sample households. Both descriptive and econometric methods were used to analyze the data. &#13;
According to the results of descriptive statistics of continues explanatory variables, there was a &#13;
statistically significant difference in age of household head, education of household head, size of farm &#13;
land, family size, livestock owned and market distance between adopters and non-adopters of IMVs. &#13;
Likewise, the results of discrete independent variables show that sex of household head, information &#13;
from government agent, and information from farmers association, access to credit and access to &#13;
training was statistically significant association with adoption of IMVs. The results of the probit model &#13;
show that adoption of the improved maize varieties among households was found to be positively &#13;
influenced by education level of the household head, total livestock owned, access to credit, access to &#13;
training, farm size, access to information from extension agent and access to information from farmers &#13;
association whereas family size and market distance influenced adoption negatively. Moreover, the &#13;
results obtained from the endogenous treatment effect model indicated that the adoption of IMVs not &#13;
only generated a significantly positive impact on household calorie intake and net crop value, but it &#13;
also reduced food insecurity. The results from this study revealed that IMVs adoptions significantly &#13;
contribute to the economic and social development of smallholder farmers by improving average &#13;
calorie intake and net crop values as well as by reducing food insecurity. Therefore, it is recommended &#13;
that governments and non-governmental organizations should encourage the adoption of improved &#13;
maize varieties on a wider scale to increase maize production and reduce food insecurity in rural &#13;
households. This is critical in realizing the IMVs potential among maize producers in the study area.
110
</description>
<dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/5464">
<title>IMPACTS OF ADOPTION OF CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES ON RURAL FARM HOUSEHOLDS’ FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY IN EAST HARARGE ZONE OF OROMIA REGINAL STATE, ETHIOPIA</title>
<link>http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/5464</link>
<description>IMPACTS OF ADOPTION OF CLIMATE-SMART AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES ON RURAL FARM HOUSEHOLDS’ FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY IN EAST HARARGE ZONE OF OROMIA REGINAL STATE, ETHIOPIA
BEYAN AHMED YUYA
Analysts and policymakers will benefit from information on climate-smart agriculture and&#13;
adaptation impacts and challenges to the adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices, to&#13;
the extent that climate change continue to conflict with people's livelihoods. The purpose of&#13;
this study was to assess the effects of climate-smart agricultural practices on the food and&#13;
nutrition security of rural households. All of the necessary information for the study was&#13;
gathered from primary and secondary data sources in accordance with the identified&#13;
objectives. Primary data were gathered from 461 sample respondents. For data analysis,&#13;
descriptive statistics and econometric models were used. The logit, ordered logit, multinomial&#13;
models were used for data anlaysis. Multinomial endogenous switching and Inverse&#13;
probability weighting method of generalized propensity score method were applied to analyze&#13;
the impact of improved practices on rural household food and nutrition security.&#13;
Estimated results show that the probability of adopting climate smart agricultural practices is&#13;
significantly influenced by gender, education level, extension contact, livestock holding,&#13;
cooperatives, market information, soil fertility status, slopes of farm land, training on land&#13;
management, climate change information, access to training, perception of land degradation,&#13;
climate change perception and weather road distance.The logistic regression model result&#13;
stated that food security status is significantly influenced by age, education, social status, soil&#13;
fertility, training, land management training, livestock holding, and climate change&#13;
information. The ordered logit results indicated that the household level nutritional status is&#13;
significantly influenced by age, cooperative, education, market information, soil fertility,&#13;
livestock holding, and all weather road distance.&#13;
Impact evaluation result indicated that adopting low levels of climate smart agricultural&#13;
practices increases farm households’ food and nutrition security statuses by 28% and 4.3%.&#13;
Adopting the medium indicators of climate smart practices increases food and nutrition&#13;
security status by 43% and 20% respectively. Whereas adopting high and higher extents of&#13;
climate smart agricultural practices increases food and nutrition security statuses by 56% and&#13;
19% and 61% and 41% over that of very low adopter households respectively. Furthermore,&#13;
the GPS impact evaluation results indicated that at 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1 treatment level in&#13;
the numbers of adopted climate-smart practices the farm household food security status&#13;
increases by 47, 72% and 86% respectively and significant at 1% probability level. Likewise,&#13;
at treatment level of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1 in the number of adopted climate smart practices,
214
</description>
<dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/5047">
<title>RURAL HOUSEHOLDS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR IMPROVED  POTABLE WATER SUPPLY IN DUGDA DISTRICT, OROMIA  NATIONAL REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA</title>
<link>http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/5047</link>
<description>RURAL HOUSEHOLDS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR IMPROVED  POTABLE WATER SUPPLY IN DUGDA DISTRICT, OROMIA  NATIONAL REGIONAL STATE, ETHIOPIA
Getinet, Shimeles
Access to improved water is one of the most essential factors for enabling sustainable &#13;
economic development. However, access to improved drinking water remains to be the &#13;
problem faced by most of the rural communities of Ethiopia. To improve this situation the &#13;
extent to which the community participates in the form of WTP for the proposed improvement &#13;
in the water supply problems is very crucial for the realization of the improvements. Hence, &#13;
this study examines the rural households’ WTP for improved potable water supply using the &#13;
application of the contingent valuation method. The double bounded dichotomous choice &#13;
followed by an open-ended question was used to elicit households’ WTP. A cross-sectional &#13;
data collected from a randomly selected 272 sample households were analyzed using &#13;
descriptive statistics and an econometric model. The SUBP econometric model was employed &#13;
to identify factors affecting household WTP and to estimate the mean WTP. The result of the &#13;
SUBP model indicated that sex of the respondent, annual farm income, off-farm income, the &#13;
average time taken to fetch water, use of water treatment techniques and monthly water &#13;
expenditure have a positive and significant effect on households’ WTP for improved water &#13;
supply. However, the variables of household size, perception of the quality of the existing &#13;
water, reliability of the existing water supply and bid values have a negative and significant &#13;
effect on households’ WTP for improved water supply. The mean WTP for improved potable &#13;
water supply obtained from the double-bound dichotomous choice and open-ended questions&#13;
were 1.80 ETB and 1.37 ETB per 20liter of Jerrican, respectively. The result indicates that &#13;
rural households are willing to pay from 5.6% to 7.4% of their average income. The &#13;
aggregate values from the improved water supply were 98118.62 ETB and 74679.17 ETB &#13;
calculated from double bounded dichotomous choice and open-ended questions, respectively.&#13;
Hence, there is a greater potential to secure financial sustainability and cost recovery of rural &#13;
water supplies by introducing a new water tariff structure and due consideration given to&#13;
household’s characteristics in the level of rural water supply improvements.
110
</description>
<dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/4573">
<title>HOUSEHOLDS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR WATERSHED  MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN LAKE HAWASSA  WATERSHED, SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA</title>
<link>http://ir.haramaya.edu.et//hru/handle/123456789/4573</link>
<description>HOUSEHOLDS’ WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR WATERSHED  MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN LAKE HAWASSA  WATERSHED, SOUTHERN ETHIOPIA
FOLA, MULUGETA(MSc); Ketema, Mengistu(MSc); Alamerie, Kumilachew (Ass. Prof); Ketema, Mengistu (Prof)
Watershed provides vast economic benefits within and beyond the management area of &#13;
interest. But most watersheds in Ethiopia are increasingly facing the threats of degradation &#13;
due to both natural and man-made causes. Inappropriate natural resource use and lower &#13;
adoption of watershed management practices are major persisting causes of its degradation. &#13;
To reverse these problems, communities’ participation in sustainable management program is &#13;
among the necessary measures. Hence, this study assessed the households’ willingness to pay &#13;
for watershed management practices through a contingent valuation study approach. Double &#13;
bounded dichotomous choice with open-ended follow-up format was used to elicit the &#13;
households’ willingness to pay. Based on data collected from 275 randomly selected &#13;
households, descriptive statistics results indicated that most households (79.64%) were willing &#13;
to pay for watershed management practices. Bivariate Probit model was employed to identify &#13;
determinants of households’ willingness to pay and estimate mean willingness to pay. Its&#13;
result shows that age, gender, income, livestock size, perception of watershed degradation, &#13;
social position and offered bids were important variables affecting willingness to pay for &#13;
watershed management practices. The study also shows that the mean willingness to pay for &#13;
watershed management practices was calculated to be 58.41 Birr and 47.27 Birr per year &#13;
from double bounded and open-ended format, respectively. The study reveals that the &#13;
aggregate welfare gains from watershed management practices were calculated to be &#13;
931581.09 Birr and 753909.23 Birr per year from double bounded dichotomous choice and &#13;
open-ended format, respectively. Therefore, the policymakers should make households to pay&#13;
for the services of watershed management practices in the study area.
81
</description>
<dc:date>2020-12-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
