DIAGNOSIS OF STUDENTS’ MISCONCEPTION ON CHEMICAL BONDING USING FOUR-TIER DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author gissa dinsa, Tolera
dc.contributor.author temesgen, Ayalew Major Advisor Dr
dc.contributor.author yiheyis, bogale Co-Advisor Dr
dc.date.accessioned 2014-11-25T03:18:51Z
dc.date.available 2014-11-25T03:18:51Z
dc.date.issued 2019-08
dc.identifier.uri http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/374
dc.description 75 en_US
dc.description.abstract Chemical bonding is one of the key concepts in chemistry and the most fundamental one. Chemical bonding is a topic that students commonly find abstract and problematic. Thus, chemical bonding is considered as difficult topic and students had misconception about bond polarity, intermolecular force, the octet rule, shapes, conductivity and lattice energy. The purpose of this study was to identify the major misconceptions of grade 10 and 12 students’ in the chemical bonding and to identify the sources of these misconceptions. The nature of the study is a descriptive setting. Participants of the study were 80 grade 10 students and 64 grade 12 students. The 4TMCT was developed after their prior conceptions about the selected topics of the study were collected from students through review of related literature, observation of lessons on chemical bonding, common mistakes of focus class students during different assessment techniques (answering worksheets, class tests) and individual interview questions with volunteer students. Data was collected by using 4TMCTand Interview questions were employed to gather the relevant data. Data was analyzed by using Statistical Package for the Social Science program (SPSS). The results from SPSS (bivariate and reliability analysis) showed that average value of reliability coefficient and correlation between first and second tiers, third tiers and fourth tiers, second tier and both confidence tiers were 0.98, 0.95, 0.94, 0.9 of grade 10 students and 0.97,0.92, 0.94, 0.88 of grade twelve students respectively. The results also revealed that chemistry daily experiences, text books, language difficulty, subject matter knowledge of students and chemistry instructional methods were the major source of students’ misconception about chemical bonding. The result showed that the majority of the students had high level of difficulty about chemical bonding. In this study the common misconceptions were identified on chemical boding which was categorized into: bond polarity, intermolecular force, intramolecular force, the octet rule, solubility, shapes, conductivity and lattice energy. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship Haramaya university en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Haramaya university en_US
dc.subject chemical bonding, false positive, false negative, four-tier multiple choice test, Misconception en_US
dc.title DIAGNOSIS OF STUDENTS’ MISCONCEPTION ON CHEMICAL BONDING USING FOUR-TIER DIAGNOSTIC INSTRUMENT en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search HU-IR System


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account