dc.description.abstract |
Maize (Zea mays L.) is an important component of farming systems and staple food crop in sub-
Saharan Africa. In Ethiopia it is a staple food crop and one of the main sources of calories in the
major maize producing regions. It is cultivated on about 2.135 million hectares of land. The
national average yield of maize under subsistence production is 3667.5kg/ha. This is too much
below the world’s average yield which is over 6520 kg/ha. This low yield is attributed to several
factors among which foliar diseases and insect pests are the major once. Gray leaf spot (GLS)
caused by the pathogen Cercospora zeae-maydis is one of the necrotrophic and polycyclic foliar
diseases of maize that poses a serious problem to maize production and productivity in Ethiopia.
Field surveys were conducted in Western and South western parts of the Oromia National
Regional State, Ethiopia during 2015 and 2016 main cropping seasons to determine the
distribution, prevalence, importance and the association of gray leaf spot (Cercospora Zeae
maydis) epidemics with environmental factors and cultural practices. In both years a total of 480
maize fields were surveyed in four zones and 90% of the fields were infested with gray leaf spot.
Gray leaf spot incidence and severity varied among zones, between years, altitude range, soil types
and field management practices. The mean disease incidence in 2 years ranged from 35% in Horro
Guduru to 95% in Jimma zone and severity ranged from 25% in west Shewa to 75% at Jimma and
East Wollega zones where it was significantly higher. The incidence in 2016 cropping season was
higher by 55% than in 2015. Logistic regression was used to analyze the association of gray leaf
spot incidence and severity with environmental factors and cultural practices as independent
variables. Analysis of result (p=0001) showed Zones, varieties, cropping year, soil type, maize
crop residues and weed management practices were significantly associated with gray leaf spot
incidence and severity in a multiple variable model. Higher incidence of gray leaf spot was
significantly associated with east Wollega and Jimma zones, crop residue, rain fall and sowing
dates. Lower incidences had a high probability of association with Horro Guduru and west Shewa
in (2015) cropping year and good weed management practices. In a reduced multiple variable
xiv
model, sowing date, variety, area, year, weed management practices and tillage frequency were
significantly associated with higher gray leaf spot incidence and severity. Increased incidence was
observed in maize intercropped with haricot bean than brassica spps. The survey revealed high
occurrence and distribution of gray leaf spot in the study area. Thus, effective and feasible
management options need to be developed in combating this foliar disease of maize. In experiment
two fourteen advanced maize inbred lines and locally adapted hybrid maize (BH-540) as a check
were used to investigate their reaction to GLS disease. Field experiments were conducted at Bako
National Maize Research Centre in 2015 and 2016 main planting seasons arranged in a
randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Artificial inoculation with
Cercospora zeae-maydis was conducted by applying dry, ground, infected maize leaves into the
whorls of younger maize plants. Data on agronomic and disease parameters (latent period, disease
severity, disease incidence and lesion type) were recorded from the middle two rows. From the
combined analysis of variance, maize genotypes showed significant differences with reaction to
GLS indicating the existence of genetic variability among the selected genotypes. Highly
significant differences were also observed among entries for all agronomic parameters in both
seasons. Gray leaf spot incidence and severity varied among genotypes and between years. The
mean GLS incidence and severity were higher in 2016 than 2015. GLS disease incidence in two
years ranged from 35% on Sc22 to 95% on CML-387 and severity ranged from 15% on A-7016 to
75% on CKL05003. Significant differences in epidemic variability were also observed among
genotypes and seasons. From the analysis of disease progress curves Logistic model (R2=94.55)
better described the disease progress curves than the Gompertz model (R2=91.50). Parents; P6 and
P8 had the most desirable quality for the most of agronomic traits whereas P2, P7 and P9 were the
best parents for grain yield. Among all inbred lines, P6, P7 and P14 were identified as the most
desirable sources of genes for GLS disease resistance. But P6, P7, P8 and P14 were identified as
the best genotypes in yield, yield related traits and GLS disease parameters. Thus, these parents
were recommended to be used in breeding programs with a purpose of developing high yielder and
GLS disease resistant open pollinated varieties. In conclusion this study identified potential and
promising high yielding and GLS resistant open pollinated genotypes (CKL05017-B-B, CML-395,
CML-387, A-7016, Gutto and Sc22). Therefore, it is recommended that these OPVs can be used
by resource poor farmers for direct production where this disease is the most prevalent and/or for
further breeding programs in generating novel hybrids for future use. Similarly in experiment three
ten elite maize inbred lines were selected based on all over per se performance and gray leaf spot
disease reaction. Crosses were made in a 10 x 10 half-diallel mating design to produce 45 F1
single cross hybrids. The experiment was conducted at Bako national maize research center in
xv
2015 and evaluation of the crosses were made at Bako and Jimma research centers in 2016 by
using alpha lattice design with three replications including three commercial checks. Artificial
inoculation with Cercospora zeae-maydis was conducted by applying dry, ground, infected maize
leaves into the whorls of younger maize plants. All the necessary yield, agronomic and GLS
disease data were recorded. In all the studied traits highly significant genotypic differences were
observed indicating the existence of genetic variability among the crosses. Analysis of variance for
the combining ability indicated GCA and SCA mean squares were significant at (P<0.001) for all
traits except for anthesis-silking interval, ear per plant, ear diameter, lesion length and width. The
ratios of GCA/ SCA variances for agronomic parameters and all disease parameters were greater
than unity except for that of first disease appearance implying the predominance of additive gene
actions. P3 and P4 had the most desirable quality for most agronomic traits whereas P2, P7 and P9
were the best combiners for grain yield with the general combining ability (GCA) effects of 0.80,
0.75 and 1.56 respectively. Among all inbred lines, P1, P4, P7, P8 and P9 were identified as
desirable sources of resistant genes for GLS disease resistance with positive days of first disease
appearance and negative disease incidence, severity and AUDPC values for GCA effects. Some of
the cross combinations showed significant SCA effects, suggesting that these crosses have
performed significantly higher or lower than what was predicted based on their parental
performances implying the importance the non additive gene action. From the analysis of
epidemiological data and disease progress curves the Logistic model (R2=96.5) better described
the disease progress curves than the Gompertz model (R2=92.5) indicating the presence of
delayance in epidemics and the inflection point of the GLS disease. P1, P7 and P8 were identified
as a good general combiners for yield, yield related traits and GLS disease parameters. Thus, these
parents were recommended to be used in breeding programs with a purpose of developing high
yielder and GLS disease resistant single cross hybrids. In conclusion this study identified potential
high yielding and GLS resistant single cross hybrids (CML-395/ CML383, CML395/Sc22, CML-
395/CML-197 and CML-383/CML-197). Therefore, it is recommended that these hybrids can be
used for direct production where this disease is the most prevalent and/or for further breeding
programs in generating novel hybrids for future use |
en_US |