Abstract:
Climate-resilient crop production requires the use of crop technology that can sustainably
increase productivity, decrease vulnerability, and improve resilience. Despite countrywide
initiatives that promote climate smart agricultural technologies adoption, the rate of adoption
has been extremely low. Similarly, the level of vulnerability varies significantly across
households, nations, and regions. Moreover, although the 2030 agenda's aim of "zero hunger
and malnutrition" has achieved tremendous progress, the prevalence of food insecurity and
malnutrition is constantly rising worldwide. Thus, this study aims to analyze the climate smart
agricultural technologies adoptions and their impact on reducing vulnerability and building
resilience to climate change, improving food and nutrition security of smallholder wheat
farmers in Arsi zone. Towards this, plot-level primary data were gathered from 628 plots that
were managed by 422 randomly selected wheat-producing smallholder farmers in three selected
districts of the Zone. Descriptive statistics and econometric models including the multivariate
probit model, the binary logit model, the ordered logit model, and the multinomial endogenous
switching regression(MNESR) were used to analyze the data. Among the major climate smart
agricultural technologies adopted for wheat production in the study area, this study considered
improved wheat varieties, integrated soil fertility management, and irrigation technologies. The
result indicated that improved wheat varieties, integrated soil fertility management, and
irrigation technologies were adopted on 95%, 85%, and 19% of the wheat plots, respectively.
The result of the MVP revealed that farmers with higher levels of education, farming experience,
and contact with extension workers, have credit access, are members of social organizations,
have access to market information, have greater annual total income, and are closer to the
nearest market center and wheat farm are more likely to adopt climate smart agricultural
technologies in wheat production. The result of vulnerability as expected poverty (VEP) pointed
out that 60.66% of the sample households were vulnerable to climate change while the
remaining 39.34% were not. In addition, the sample household’s average resilience index was
found to be 0.976 as revealed by the result of the resilience index measurement
approach (RIMA). In a similar vein, the absorptive capacity (0.401) was the primary
contributor among the resilience components, followed by the adaptive (0.320) and
transformative (0.255) capacities. The result from the logit model pointed out that households
that participated in off-farm income-generating activities, had large areas of farmland and
owned large numbers of livestock, had frequent contact with extension workers, had access to
improved wheat varieties and irrigation, lived in highland agroecology and participated in
social organizations was probably less susceptible to climate change. The food and nutrition
security status were measured, respectively, using the household calorie acquisition score and
household dietary diversity score. Descriptive statistics showed that whereas 29.15% of the
sample households were food insecure, 70.85% of the households were secure in their food.
Similarly, low, medium, and high nutritional levels were discovered in 26.07%, 52.61%, and
xviii
21.33% of the sample families, respectively. The binary logit model's result showed that while
family size and distance from the market were negatively associated with the likelihood of food
security, livestock holding, frequency of extension contact, chemical fertilizer, irrigation, and
vegetation coverage were positively associated with it. The ordered logit results indicated that
while the distances to the market and health center were negatively associated with household
nutritional status, the level of education, participation in safety-net programs, total income,
farm size, market information, and soil fertility had positive and significant effects. The impact
of adopting climate smart agricultural technologies on the vulnerability and resilience to
climate change, and food and nutrition security of wheat farmers were analyzed using the
MNESR model. The result revealed that the adoption of climate-smart agricultural technologies
has a positive and significant impact on reducing vulnerability and improving wheat farmers’
resilience to climate change, improving food and nutrition security in the study area. Moreover,
the highest impact is attained when wheat farmers adopt a combination of climate-smart
agricultural technologies than in isolation. Hence, expanding the implementation of climate-
smart agricultural technologies can lower vulnerability to climate change, increase resilience
to it, and improve the food and nutrition security of smallholder wheat farmers.