| dc.description.abstract |
Postharvest loss poses a significant challenge to tomato producers and market chain actors in
Adea district, necessitating a thorough assessment to identify areas for intervention. By
employing a combination of primary data from 171 tomato-producing households and a
sample of 32 traders including, 5 wholesalers, 14 retailers, 5 collectors and 8 consumers from
two kebeles namely Godino and K’at’ila, along with both descriptive and econometric models,
the study revealed critical insights. Results showed seven distinct market channels, with
producers earning the highest profit when selling directly to wholesalers. The highest total
gross marketing margin occurred in channels with multiple intermediaries. Postharvest loss
averaged 47.02 quintals per hectare, with transportation being the leading cause (30.48%),
followed by packaging, handling, storage, grading, and loading. Retailers experienced the
highest losses (28.35%) due to frequent handling, poor packaging, and exposure to unsuitable
conditions like heat and humidity. Collectors experienced moderate postharvest losses
(12.76%), primarily resulting from inadequate packaging, transportation, and storage
conditions. In contrast, wholesalers had the lowest losses (5.28%) due to better bulk handling
and storage practices. Furthermore, robust multiple linear regression analysis identified
explanatory variables such as credit, extension contact, insect pest infestations/rodents, farm
size and distance to main road affected postharvest loss of tomato. By enhancing financial
inclusion, training in postharvest management and handling techniques to reduce insect pest infestations and investing in infrastructure, policymakers can develop targeted interventions
that substantially reduce losses, boost productivity and strengthen food security |
en_US |