Abstract:
The different ethnic groups in Ethiopia as a whole and the Guji-Oromo of Bule-Hora district,
in particular, had their own indigenous conflict resolution institutions long-lived for years.
Those different institutions had been serving to resolve current conflicts that erupt in the
community at distinct scales. With the introduction of the 1930's criminal law of the Empire of
Ethiopia, there was a shift of dealing with dispute cases through two different legal systems.
These are the government court and the indigenous system of conflict resolution institutions
like Gondooroo. The Gondooroo institution has been functional and the majority of dispute
cases in the district are handled according to its procedures. There has been scanty or little
knowledge produced on the practices and roles of Gondooroo. As a result, this study explore
the conflict resolution mechanisms deployed among the Guji-Oromo of Bule-Hora district,
with particular emphasis on Gondooroo institution. Methodologically, data were collected
from both primary and secondary sources through purposive (non-probability) sampling
techniques. Overall, the study pursued an interpretive qualitative field work approach and
interview, focus group discussion and observation methods of data collection were used.
However, as the finding of study showed that; many of the challenges such as the excluded of
women under the Gadaa grades, the absence of income generating resources of institution,
unequal participation of men and women in Gondooroo practices, less beliefs of community
towards women roles in conflict resolution and the misunderstanding of few individuals
towards women role in Gondooroo practice”, the few government and legal experts negatively
cricizes of Gondoorooroo practices such as “Gondooroo lacks police- personnel, prison
house and formally putted laws and their mis-undestanding of saying Gondooroo is unable to
resolve conflicts in a good manner”, the expands of urban area/urbanization and the
existences of formal law in both rural and urban area were other challenges. Because,
different background people lives together in the urban and those different background people
may not interested by the institution practices and takes their cases to the formal court by
considering the Gondooroo us unable to resolve the conflicts. These above socio-economic,
political and cultural challenges were influencing the Gondooroo practices, as conflict
resolution institution. Therefore, the residents of the district, key agents of the institution like
Abbaa Gadaas, Hayyuus, knowledgeable elderly women, Torbii and Government body from
kebele to Zone should work together to solve the problems existing with the institution and
create better conditions for the institution to resolve conflicts existing in the area in good
manner.