INDIGENOUS INSTITUTIONS OF CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND ITS CHALLENGES IN EAST HARARGE: THE CASE OF KOMBOLCHA DISTRICT (WEREDA): 1875 - 1991

Abstract

This research focuses on exploring the role of indigenous conflict management institutions in East Hararge, with specific emphasis on the Kombolcha District (District) from 1875 to 1991. The primary objective is to investigate the practices of conflict resolution, socio-political systems, and the cultural and historical connections of Afran Qallo. Moreover, the study examines the historical development, functioning, and challenges encountered by these indigenous institutions. To carry out this research, a qualitative approach was adopted, which involved conducting interviews and consulting relevant academic publications, books, and articles dedicated to the study of indigenous conflict management institutions. These secondary sources provided insights into various aspects, including the history, cultural practices, and socio-political systems related to Afran Qallo. By doing so, it contributes to a deeper cross-cultural understanding and knowledge of the historical and socio-political background of this indigenous community. The findings of the study highlight significant transformations that have occurred within indigenous law and the center of assembly, shaped by both internal and external factors. Internally, changes in social, cultural, and economic aspects of the community have played a role in shaping amendments to indigenous law. Factors such as shifts in power dynamics, generational gaps, changes in livelihood patterns, and the erosion of traditional values and practices have influenced the functioning and adaptability of indigenous systems. Externally, factors like invasion, legal pluralism, and the influence of contemporary legal frameworks have had a profound impact on indigenous law and the center of assembly (Caffee). These external factors have brought forth new norms, legal structures, and governance systems, resulting in the integration, reimagining, or marginalization of indigenous law and the center of assembly. Despite these changes, the research reveals elements of continuity within indigenous law. The flexibility of customary practices, the importance of community participation in decision-making processes, and the preservation of oral traditions all demonstrate the enduring nature of indigenous legal systems. By understanding the complex interactions between internal and external factors affecting indigenous law and the center of assembly, this research contributes valuable insights into the dynamics of legal and cultural systems. The findings add to the ongoing xvi discussions surrounding topics such as legal pluralism, community governance, and the preservation of indigenous law and traditions